Home
Forum Info
Supporting Framework
Document Library
Manila GFMD Program
Roundtable Themes
Delegation Info
Media Info
Contact Us





Home arrow Roundtable Themes arrow Roundtable 3
Roundtable 3: Policy and institutional coherence and partnerships
[French]

ImagePolicy and institutional coherence and partnerships can optimize the beneficial impact of migration on development and vice versa. They should be promoted on the domestic, regional, and international fronts among the diverse stakeholders in migration and development.

To achieve policy and institutional coherence, data gathering and research need to be strengthened as a matter of priority. The GFMD meeting in Brussels brought to light the chronic lack of data and research to inform and reinforce policy and institutional coherence, in regard to the links between migration and development and between these and other related policy areas such as aid and trade. There is an urgent need in both origin and host countries for measurable evidence of these linkages, and for better identification of the knowledge gaps to enable government and other policy makers to prioritize their research needs. Piecemeal research efforts to measure impacts and establish new analytical tools need to be coordinated across countries, and research networks need to be strengthened internationally to assist in this task.

Underpinning any efforts at more linked-up policy making is the need for appropriate formal and informal structures and mechanisms to enable government officials in the migration and development fields, as well as concerned Parliamentarians, to consult with one another, also from country to country. The GFMD focal point system can be a catalyst for this. One important strategy to better link the two policy fields is to include migration concerns in national development planning processes and Poverty Reduction Strategies, where appropriate. Capacity building to achieve this may need to be built into development partnerships.

Regional consultative processes (RCPs) on migration, and other forms of regional coordination and cooperation, are also increasingly effective frameworks for pursuing coordination and coherence through informal dialogue, partnership and capacity building. While most RCPs are still not primarily engaged with the migration-development nexus, they can offer some good practices in international cooperation between countries of origin and host countries of interest to the GFMD. For example, they can facilitate circulation and bilateral agreements on migrant protection and counter trafficking, and reduce bureaucratic obstacles to freer circulation. The GFMD can help encourage such initiatives within the development context.

This Roundtable will continue the work begun in Brussels RT 3 on data and research on impact measurement, key policy lessons from research, proposals to establish inter-country and inter-institutional working groups on these issues, the intergovernmental survey on institutional structures and mechanisms towards policy coherence and follow-up efforts at greater coherence among RCPs and between them and the GFMD. It will bring to the debate the outcomes of Brussels follow-up actions undertaken in these areas by Finland and Sweden and their respective partners, and by some member governments and secretariats of the RCPs and their international partners.

3.1 Strengthening data and research tools on migration and development

This session will provide an update on efforts within and between countries to better collect data and measure the development impacts of migration towards more synergistic policy-making and cooperation on migration and development. It will continue the work, and build on the results of the RT3.1 session in Brussels, to examine more common definitions and methodologies for data collection and research across countries, and to identify gaps in research on migration and development. Governments and expert agencies will share ideas and experiences on how best to evaluate the impacts of migration on development and vice versa, as well as the respective impacts of policies in both areas.

The outcomes of the working group and experts meeting organized by Finland will be presented with a view to identifying ways of strengthening research networks across countries and regions, enhancing research capacities in developing countries, and ensuring greater inclusion of migration in national development plans and strategies, such as Poverty Reduction Strategy Programs (PRSPs).

  The session will address the questions:
  What are the critical gaps in data on the migration-development inter-linkages?
  How can research and analysis be linked most productively with policy-making?
  What are the key indicators of the development-relevance of migration policies; and the key indicators of migration impacts of development policies?


3.2 Policy and institutional coherence on migration and development within Government

This session will continue the work of the Brussels meeting in identifying and sharing good practices by governments on policies and institutional structures that can strengthen coherence between migration and development. It will draw lessons from the growing efforts of governments to strengthen communication, information-sharing, coordination and negotiation among the various arms of government involved with migration, and will also consider the crucial role of Parliamentarians in drawing up appropriate legislation. The discussion will be extended to mechanisms for dialogue and cooperation between governments, such as the GFMD focal points. It will look at how consensus building can be achieved within government on ways to link up migration and development policy-making to mutual benefit. Some emerging efforts to incorporate migration into national development plans and poverty reduction strategies will be examined for their applicability to other countries.

The outcomes of a follow-up survey of governments undertaken by Sweden will be reported on, with a view to identifying a) good practices in developing and developed countries, and between them, and b) the capacity building needs in developing countries at both policy-making and institutional levels to better address migration and development-related impacts.

  The session will address the questions:
  Which mechanisms have proven most effective in promoting policy coherence? What are the key indicators of “effectiveness”?
  How can consultative processes between involved ministries, departments and agencies, and between governments, be improved?
  What are some concrete examples of effective inclusion of migration into national development plans and poverty reduction strategies? How to measure “effective” in this context?


3.3 Regional consultative processes (RCPs) at the interface of migration and development

This session will look at the experiences and advances made by regional consultative processes on migration in addressing migration and development issues at a more multilateral level. RCPs are often able to achieve forms of cross-border and cross-cutting cooperation and mutual capacity building not yet possible at the global level. They can also be effective in bringing migration issues into the agendas of larger regional economic and political integration processes. Pursuant to the Brussels meeting, the session will explore ways of strengthening the potential role of regional consultative processes in enhancing the contribution of migration to development. RCP partner governments will consider how to encourage closer linkages between RCPs and formal regional governmental processes and regular information exchange between RCPs and the GFMD.

The session will build on the outcomes and follow-up actions of Brussels RT 3 by RCP partners to strengthen the migration-development linkages in the agendas of regional consultative processes, and to foster stronger networking among the RCPs and between RCPs and the GFMD.

  The session will address the questions:
  How are RCPs and other forms of regional cooperation effecting change regarding migration and development policies at the national level? And within the agendas of larger regional economic processes?
  What are the good practices in integrating development considerations into RCP agendas?
  How can RCPs work more closely with the GFMD in mutually reinforcing ways?