|
Policy and institutional coherence and partnerships can optimize the beneficial impact of migration on development and vice versa. They should be promoted on the domestic, regional, and international fronts among the diverse stakeholders in migration and development.
To achieve policy and institutional coherence, data gathering and research need to be strengthened as a matter of priority. The GFMD meeting in Brussels brought to light the chronic lack of data and research to inform and reinforce policy and institutional coherence, in regard to the links between migration and development and between these and other related policy areas such as aid and trade. There is an urgent need in both origin and host countries for measurable evidence of these linkages, and for better identification of the knowledge gaps to enable government and other policy makers to prioritize their research needs. Piecemeal research efforts to measure impacts and establish new analytical tools need to be coordinated across countries, and research networks need to be strengthened internationally to assist in this task.
Underpinning any efforts at more linked-up policy making is the need for appropriate formal and informal structures and mechanisms to enable government officials in the migration and development fields, as well as concerned Parliamentarians, to consult with one another, also from country to country. The GFMD focal point system can be a catalyst for this. One important strategy to better link the two policy fields is to include migration concerns in national development planning processes and Poverty Reduction Strategies, where appropriate. Capacity building to achieve this may need to be built into development partnerships.
Regional consultative processes (RCPs) on migration, and other forms of regional coordination and cooperation, are also increasingly effective frameworks for pursuing coordination and coherence through informal dialogue, partnership and capacity building. While most RCPs are still not primarily engaged with the migration-development nexus, they can offer some good practices in international cooperation between countries of origin and host countries of interest to the GFMD. For example, they can facilitate circulation and bilateral agreements on migrant protection and counter trafficking, and reduce bureaucratic obstacles to freer circulation. The GFMD can help encourage such initiatives within the development context.
This Roundtable will continue the work begun in Brussels RT 3 on data and research on impact measurement, key policy lessons from research, proposals to establish inter-country and inter-institutional working groups on these issues, the intergovernmental survey on institutional structures and mechanisms towards policy coherence and follow-up efforts at greater coherence among RCPs and between them and the GFMD. It will bring to the debate the outcomes of Brussels follow-up actions undertaken in these areas by Finland and Sweden and their respective partners, and by some member governments and secretariats of the RCPs and their international partners.
|